Jonathan Wakely
2018-11-29 12:33:07 UTC
Now that __alignof__ and alignof sometimes disagree it matters which one
we use. The standard says that std::alignment_of<T>::value equals
alignof(T), so we need to use that.
Change the only uses of alignment_of to use __alignof__ to avoid a
change in alignment.
PR libstdc++/88119
* include/ext/aligned_buffer.h (__aligned_membuf): Add comment.
(__aligned_buffer): Use __alignof__ instead of std::alignment_of.
* include/std/type_traits (alignment_of): Use alignof instead of
__alignof__.
* testsuite/20_util/alignment_of/value.cc: Fix test to check values
match alignof not __alignof__, as required by the standard.
Tested powercp64le-linux, committed to trunk.
This should be changed on gcc-8-branch too.
we use. The standard says that std::alignment_of<T>::value equals
alignof(T), so we need to use that.
Change the only uses of alignment_of to use __alignof__ to avoid a
change in alignment.
PR libstdc++/88119
* include/ext/aligned_buffer.h (__aligned_membuf): Add comment.
(__aligned_buffer): Use __alignof__ instead of std::alignment_of.
* include/std/type_traits (alignment_of): Use alignof instead of
__alignof__.
* testsuite/20_util/alignment_of/value.cc: Fix test to check values
match alignof not __alignof__, as required by the standard.
Tested powercp64le-linux, committed to trunk.
This should be changed on gcc-8-branch too.